Babies Know Animals Have Gushy Insides

It appears we might be born with the knowledge that living things have insides and are not hollow. Christie Nicholson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Living things are filled with…stuff. We know this. But at what age did we start knowing this? Well, a study says it could be hardwired into our brains. Because infants seem to know that animals ought to have gushy insides, and not be hollow. The research is in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

When babies see something ununusal they look at it longer than when they see the expected.

The researchers presented toys to 8-month olds that appeared to move on their own and also have an intention to move. They also showed the babies toys that could only do only one of these things, and toys that could do neither. The researchers then opened up the objects, all of which were hollow.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


And the babies stared longer at the hollow toys that had appeared to move on their own with intention than they did at the other toys.  

It appears that these hollow toys defied the babies’ expectations, as if they were thinking: There should be something in there. Which means babies make the mental link between intentional movement and the requirement for insides. They already know that this life takes guts.

—Christie Nicholson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe