New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Ballooning Star Split Planet in Two

A recently discovered pair of exoplanets may be the wreckage of one formerly giant planet. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In about five billion years, Earth is going into the broiler. The sun will swell up into a red giant, engulfing us and the other inner planets. And that'll be that.

Or will it? Astronomers recently found two small planets orbiting very close to a star about 4,000 light-years away. The star has already passed through its red giant phase. So how did the planets survive? One idea was that the red giant had swallowed two formerly large planets and spit out the smaller cores. Imagine a star engulfing a Jupiter and leaving behind a scorched Earth—literally.

Now a new study proposes an even more violent explanation. Astrophysicists in Israel calculated that the two newfound planets might be the remnant of a single giant planet. That world would have been stripped to its core and then torn apart by the swelling star. The worlds now orbiting the former red giant would be the surviving, Earth-size chunks. ["A tidally destructed massive planet as the progenitor of the two light planets around the sdB star KIC 05807616," by Ealeal Bear and Noam Soker in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


So a planet much bigger than Earth can escape total destruction when its star goes red giant. Although being broiled, pulled apart like taffy and tossed away is no planetary picnic.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe