New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Black Hole May Eat Asteroids

The black hole at the center of Milky Way could be steadily feeding on a cloud of asteroids, producing frequent, small x-ray flares. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

At the center of our Milky Way galaxy is a supermassive black hole. It weighs as much as four million suns. The black hole is hefty, but it's pretty tranquil most of the time.

It does act up on occasion, though. Astrophysicists estimate that the black hole devours a star every 100,000 years or so, producing a major flare as the star is shredded and then ingested.

And smaller flares are observed more or less daily. For a few hours the galaxy's central black hole becomes brighter at x-ray wavelengths by a factor of a few up to 100.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


What could produce these frequent flares? A trio of astrophysicists in Europe has an idea. They propose that the black hole could be steadily feeding on a cloud of asteroids in the Milky Way's center. Those asteroids would have been stripped from orbits around nearby stars. The report will appear in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. [Kastytis Zubovas et al., "Sgr A* flares: tidal disruption of asteroids and planets?"]

The researchers estimate that the destruction of an asteroid 10 or 20 kilometers across would produce an observable flare. That's quite an impressive feat. But for a supermassive black hole, it's all in a day's work.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe