Campaign Aimed at Patient Health Ups Doc Hand Washing

Hospital health care staff increased their hand washing in response to signs reminding them that it helped patients, but not when signs urged them to wash for their own benefit. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Handwashing is the best way to avoid spreading infection, according to the CDC. But doctors, nurses and hospital staff wash up less than half as often as they should. Some hospitals encourage handwashing by posting signs that tell docs a simple scrub will prevent them from getting sick. But a study finds a more effective reminder: clean hands helps patients. The research is in the journal Psychological Science. [Adam M. Grant and David A. Hofmann, "It’s Not All about Me: Motivating Hospital Hand Hygiene by Focusing on Patients"]

Investigators posted one of three signs at 66 soap and sanitizer dispensers in a US hospital. Either “Hand hygiene prevents you from catching diseases,” “Hand hygiene prevents patients from catching diseases,” or a control sign that read “Gel in, wash out.” Then they measured how much soap and gel disappeared after two weeks. And they asked a few docs and nurses to spy on their colleagues’ handwashing habits.

Turns out hospital staff used 33 percent more soap and gel at dispensers with the message about patients. And the eyewitnesses found that staff was 10 percent more likely to lather up—especially nurses. A promising start. Though you can't blame patients for wishing docs and nurses washed their hands every time they should.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe