Can Trees Save Us from Climate Change?
Trees and other plants suck up carbon dioxide, so we might think planting forests will halt global warming. Unfortunately, it's not that simple. David Biello reports
SUBSCRIBE TO 60-Second Earth
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
[Below is the original script. Some changes may have been made during the recording of this audio podcast.]
Earth Day gets more press but the real environmental holiday this week is National Arbor Day, today! April 24th.
Trees do a lot for us: provide wood, improve health, even clean up the air.
And maybe get us out of a little problem we've created called climate change.
That's because carbon dioxide—the main greenhouse gas driving climate change—is plant food. The leaves of trees suck in sunlight and then chemically convert CO2 to carbohydrates. This process called photosynthesis sustains almost all life on Earth.
So the answer to climate change is simple, right? Just plant more trees.
Well…it’s not that easy. Trees have a habit of dying and decomposing, which puts a lot of that CO2 back into the atmosphere. And since our goal is to pull CO2 from the atmosphere permanently, trees are not the best solution.
But we have a lot to do with that too. Humans cut down a lot of trees, making deforestation the second biggest source of the 30 billion metric tons of CO2 put into the atmosphere yearly by us. Planting trees might not solve global warming, but cutting back on cutting down trees would be a big help.
—David Biello
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
