Rock Stars Get Early Tombstones
North American and European music stars are twice as likely to die prematurely as are members of the general population. Steve Mirsky reports.

SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
We all know smoking is dangerous. But being a smoking hot rock or pop star may be even more dangerous. Just ask Elvis. Or John Lennon. Or Janis Joplin. Or Jimi Hendrix. Or Buddy Holly. Or Tupac Shakur.
A study in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health looked at more than a thousand North American and European singers and musicians who became famous between 1956 and 1999. The researchers found that rock and pop stars are more than twice as likely to die an early death as the rest of us nobodies. And the first few years after becoming famous are the most dangerous. Drug and alcohol abuse account for about a quarter of the early deaths.
In all, 100 of the 1050 music stars included in the study were found to die young. The average age of death for the North Americans was 42. The Europeans only made it to 35. If they can stay famous for 25 years after their initial stardom, European stars’ death rates become equal to the general population. But American idols continue to die sooner than regular folks.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.