Cell Phones in Hospitals May Be Covered with Germs

A study in a hospital in Turkey found that three quarters of cell phones belonging to patients and visitors carried staph bacteria. Katherine Harmon reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

We already know that cell phones carry all sorts of germs. They've been found to have about 18 times more bacteria than your average toilet handle. People do tend to use their phones everywhere. Including the doctor's office and the hospital, where especially nasty bugs can be lurking.

Now a study finds that some of these more potent pathogens make it onto the surfaces of mobile phones. Of 133 phones belonging to patients and their visitors at a Turkish hospital, more than three quarters were carrying staph bacteria—and one phone had the multidrug-resistant strain MRSA. Five of the phones also tested positive for E. coli—and two had a drug-resistant type.

The cell phones of the hospital’s health care workers were a little cleaner. Twenty percent of employee mobile phones carried pathogenic bacteria—none of which were multidrug-resistant. The research is published in the American Journal of Infection Control. [Mehmet Sait Tekerekoǧlu et al., "Do Mobile Phones of Patients, Companions and Visitors Carry Multidrug-Resistant Hospital Pathogens?"]

Exposing phones to UV radiation would be a quick way to zap bacteria. Covering cells in washable plastic covers could also cut down on unintended transmission. So it might be time for cell phones to scrub in, too.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


—Katherine Harmon

[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe