Clever Cooler Cases Could Conserve Current

Better design of supermarket fridge cases could save $100 million in electricity annually. Cynthia Graber reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Ever wander through a supermarket and past the open refrigerated cases that house cream cheese, butter and OJ? The refrigerated shelves are protected by jets of air that blow across the front. These jets form an air shield to keep the warm air out.

Trouble is, it doesn’t always work. The cases use extra energy to cool the air that leaks in. So researchers tested the ubiquitous cases. They shot air across the front to try out a variety of speeds, angles and other factors. They used a tracer gas to measure warm air infiltration.

And they found that the key players are the angle of the air grills and what’s called a Reynolds number—which involves the air jet’s speed and density and the jet’s turbulence.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


By adjusting these variables, they were able to get a ten percent reduction in warm air infiltration. Which the researchers say could save $100 million worth of electricity each year. The research was published in the journal Applied Thermal Engineering. [Mazyar Amin, Dana Dabiri and Homayun K. Navaz, "Comprehensive study on the effects of fluid dynamics of air curtain and geometry, on infiltration rate of open refrigerated cavities"]

The researchers have designed a system so that fridge case manufacturers can optimize their companies’ designs. And save us all some cold cash.

—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe