New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Dark Matter Clump Furrows Brows

Dark matter doesn't usually collide much with itself or with ordinary matter, but it appears to be uncharacteristically clumping in the galaxy cluster A520. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Dark matter. It’s hard to see, it’s hard to study and it just won’t behave. There’s plenty dark matter around. It’s just that no one knows what it is. It only makes its presence felt through its gravitational pull.

But astronomers have figured out ways to ID dark matter. One tactic is called gravitational lensing. Dark matter’s gravitational pull bends light, so clumps of dark matter distort the appearance of galaxies in the background. Researchers measured those distortions with the Hubble Space Telescope. And they recently mapped out the dark matter in a galaxy cluster called A520. Which is actually several galaxy clusters, all smashing together.

The problem was, the dark matter in A520 wasn’t where it ought to be. Past studies have shown that clouds of dark matter pass cleanly through one another when galaxy clusters merge. That’s because dark matter doesn’t collide much with itself or with ordinary matter. But in this case the dark matter seemed to bunch up in the middle, as if it was sticking together. The study appears in the Astrophysical Journal. [M. James Jee et al., "A study of the dark core in A520 with the Hubble Space Telescope: The mystery deepens"]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Why should dark matter behave so differently in different galaxy clusters? On that front, astronomers are still in the dark.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe