Dark Matter Clump Furrows Brows

Dark matter doesn't usually collide much with itself or with ordinary matter, but it appears to be uncharacteristically clumping in the galaxy cluster A520. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Dark matter. It’s hard to see, it’s hard to study and it just won’t behave. There’s plenty dark matter around. It’s just that no one knows what it is. It only makes its presence felt through its gravitational pull.

But astronomers have figured out ways to ID dark matter. One tactic is called gravitational lensing. Dark matter’s gravitational pull bends light, so clumps of dark matter distort the appearance of galaxies in the background. Researchers measured those distortions with the Hubble Space Telescope. And they recently mapped out the dark matter in a galaxy cluster called A520. Which is actually several galaxy clusters, all smashing together.

The problem was, the dark matter in A520 wasn’t where it ought to be. Past studies have shown that clouds of dark matter pass cleanly through one another when galaxy clusters merge. That’s because dark matter doesn’t collide much with itself or with ordinary matter. But in this case the dark matter seemed to bunch up in the middle, as if it was sticking together. The study appears in the Astrophysical Journal. [M. James Jee et al., "A study of the dark core in A520 with the Hubble Space Telescope: The mystery deepens"]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Why should dark matter behave so differently in different galaxy clusters? On that front, astronomers are still in the dark.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe