New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Dung Beetles Use Milky Way to Guide Movement (Heh)

On moonless nights, dung beetles apparently use the Milky Way's band of light as a navigation guide. Christopher Intagliata reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sailors don't need to read the stars anymore—they've got GPS. But dung beetles do not have GPS. And it now appears that they use the Milky Way as a compass.

Dung beetles need a keen sense of direction so they can roll their dung patties away from the communal dung pile, and feast in peace. Ten years ago, Marie Dacke at Lund University in Sweden and her colleagues discovered that some dung beetles use polarized moonlight to keep a straight course. But what’s their plan on moonless nights?

Dacke tracked the beetles as they successfully rolled dung away from the center of a circular sandbox. Then she blocked the beetles' starry view with tiny cardboard hats, and set 'em loose again. Without stars to guide them, the beetles traveling twisted, circular paths. Those findings appear in the journal Current Biology. [Marie Dacke et al., Dung Beetles Use the Milky Way for Orientation]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The beetles' tiny compound eyes probably aren't sharp enough to make out individual stars. In a planetarium, for example, when only 18 bright stars were illuminated, the beetles got lost. But the faint streak of the Milky Way seems to be just enough light to point them to a dung dining hole—no reservations required.

—Christopher Intagliata

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Also see Dung Beetles Follow the Stars

 

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe