Platypus Genome Is Duckbill Oddball

Brown University biologist Ken Miller comments at the American Museum of Natural History on the just-published genome of that strange amalgamated mammal, the platypus. Steve Mirsky reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

Robin Williams thought that the platypus was cobbled together by an inebriated deity: “Let’s take a beaver.  Let’s put on a duck’s bill.”  Now we know how weird the platypus is at the genetic level.  Because researchers published the sequence of the platypus genome in the May 8th issue of the journal Nature.  Brown University biologist Kenneth Miller commented on the platypus genome research that same night at the American Museum of Natural History:

“The platypus…has been known for a long time to have a very curious amalgam of anatomical features. So the interesting question is when we get a look at its DNA would it also have a curious amalgam of genetic features…it sure does.  In fact, parts of it apparently were extremely difficult to sequence because they were so different from other mammalian genomes, to which we often compare sequences in order to align them and put the sequence together.  It has not just a curious combination of mammalian and reptilian physiological features, it has a curious combination of mammalian and reptilian genetic features as well.”  (Williams, doing his stoned deity impression again): “He’s a mammal.  But he lays eggs!”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


—Steve Mirsky

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast: RSS | iTunes

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe