CSI: Eye--Contact Lenses Provide Clues To Infections

Contact lenses are more than twice as likely to provide doctors with samples of the microbes causing a corneal infection as is the cornea itself. Steve Mirsky reports.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


September 11, 2007 -- CSI: Eye-Contact Lenses Provide Clues To Infections

If you ever get an infection of the cornea and you wear contact lenses, save the lenses!  They could help your doctor figure out what medication would be the best bet to cure what ails you. Wearing contacts is associated with an increased risk of microbial keratitis, or corneal eye infection.  Such an infection can sometimes lead to complications that might threaten your sight.  Doctors will take a scraping from the cornea and then try to identify whatever organisms are present.  But in a study reported in the September issue of Archives of Ophthalmology, only 34 percent of corneal scrapings from contact lens-wearing keratitis patients allowed researchers to identify the microbes involved.  But 70 percent of contact lenses from the affected patients harbored microbes.  The study included 49 patients—with a total of 50 infected eyes—seen at a hospital in Melbourne, Australia.  Said one of the study’s authors, “Contact lens culture may give a clue regarding the identity of the causative organism in situations in which the corneal scraping is culture negative, and may help in choosing the appropriate antimicrobial agent.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe