Fish Vision Splits Species

Fish in Lake Victoria don't interact with certain other individuals because they literally can no longer see them. Karen Hopkin reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

They say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. It turns out that maybe speciation is, too. Because a study in the October 2nd issue of Nature suggests that how fishes see one another can drive the formation of new species.

Scientists in the U.S. and Switzerland were studying the cichlids that live in African lakes. These fishes have evolved into a stunning variety of species—more than 500 of which live in Lake Victoria alone. The species differ in their behavior and coloration. For example, in some parts of the lake, blue-colored species tend to live in the shallows, and red ones near the bottom. That makes sense, because the deeper you go, the harder it is to see blue.

What the scientists found is that the blue fish that live in the shallow waters also tend to have visual pigments that are fine-tuned to see the color blue. And the red fish that live deeper can better see red. So, red females are more likely to mate with red males. And pretty soon you’ve got two species in which a female of one color won’t even look at a male of another color. Because she can’t see him. It’s probably little consolation when she says “It’s not you, it’s me.”

—Karen Hopkin 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast:

RSS | iTunes 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe