New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Foxes Have Dined on Our Leftovers for 30,000 Years

An analysis of fox fossils found evidence that they scavenged from wolf and bear kills until Homo sapiens supplied plenty of horse and reindeer remains.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Foxes hunt small animals. And when other predators, including us, kill large animals, foxes are known to scavenge on the leftovers. Now a study of their scavenging shows that foxes have slyly relied on people for food for tens of thousands of years.

“I saw that foxes benefit a lot today from humans. And I was wondering if this was also the case in the past.”

Chris Baumann from the University of Tübingen’s Institute for Scientific Archaeology.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Humans may have had a hand in driving the extinction of large herbivores like mammoths and mastodons in the Late Pleistocene, which ended around 12,000 years ago. But we inadvertently helped other species—and Baumann suspected that Pleistocene-era foxes may have been among them.

So Baumann and his team obtained the remains of 70 foxes found in southwestern Germany. They ranged from around 42,000 years ago, when Neandertals lived in the area, to some 30,000 years ago, when Homo sapiens came to dominate the region.

“In the study, we analyzed the bone collagen of the foxes and saw that there are indeed these different strategies of feeding.”

The carbon and nitrogen isotopes in the fox bones supplied clues to what the foxes had eaten. And at the earlier Neandertal-era sites, a few of the foxes hunted rodents, but most had a diet indistinguishable from the larger carnivores—meaning that they regularly scavenged from the kills made by wolves and bears.

But by the late Pleistocene, when we showed up, the foxes had switched to a diet of mainly reindeer and horse meat—that is, human table scraps. The finding is in the journal PLOS ONE. [Chris Baumann et al., Fox dietary ecology as a tracer of human impact on Pleistocene ecosystems]

“And so this one niche that we figured out, that comes when Homo sapiens entered this area, is more or less stable. So the foxes have time to feed on this resource over the last years of their life. And that’s very cool, because now we know that humans must have made some changes in the environment to provide this niche.”

Neandertals surely hunted animals, too. But there weren’t enough of them, or they didn’t stay in one place long enough, for the foxes to adapt to scavenging off their dinner plates. Homo sapiens, on the other hand, did stick around long enough to affect the foxes’ foraging strategy.

Baumann says that studying the remains of opportunistic scavengers like foxes—that learn to take advantage of human societies—can offer useful information about human impacts on ecosystems over time.

—Jason G. Goldman

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe