Gates CEO: Let's Shrink Maternal Mortality
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation CEO Susan Desmond-Hellmann talks about some of what needs to be done to make a reality of the foundation's aspiration to cut maternal mortality by two thirds by 2030
By Steve Mirsky & Mariette DiChristina
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
“Another one of the aspirations in the letter is between now and 2030 to cut by two thirds maternal mortality.”
Dr. Susan Desmond-Hellmann is CEO of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. On January 26th, she spoke with Scientific American about the goals the international philanthropic foundation put forth in its just-released annual letter.
“This has been an area that’s so important and so challenging. It is essential to think about all aspects of that. For example, one of the areas that the Foundation is now funding is family planning, so that a woman, or a young woman in particular, can decide when she wants to become pregnant, that that’s a decision she can make and she can space her children. And so I think it starts with that. We also have a big focus on nutrition, so a mom having a good nutritional status when she’s pregnant, again, very helpful. And then, again, working with local groups, with ministries of health, to make sure that a woman can deliver at a facility, where things are there available should she need the kind of care that having the baby at home wouldn’t enable her to have.”
For the full conversation between Gates Foundation CEO Susan Desmond-Hellmann and Scientific American Editor in Chief Mariette DiChristina, look on our website for the upcoming Science Talk podcast.
—Steve Mirsky
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
