Giant Black Hole May Be Fugitive

The black hole in galaxy NGC 1277 is way more massive than usual. Astronomers hypothesize it was ejected from another galaxy before settling in its new home. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Black holes tend to be pretty massive. The one at the center of our galaxy is about four million times the mass of the sun.

But that’s puny compared with the whopper that researchers discovered last year in an otherwise unremarkable galaxy called NGC 1277. Its black hole is some 17 billion times the mass of the sun.

By typical standards, such a black hole is about 100 times too massive for that galaxy.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The discovery got researchers wondering how the mismatch came about.
One idea—albeit a speculative one—is that the black hole actually came from a different galaxy. 

Say the black hole formed from the merger of two smaller black holes in a larger galaxy nearby. The recoil from that violent event could have flung the ultramassive black hole into space. Where it wandered, among a cluster of galaxies, before settling into a new home in NGC 1277. The hypothesis is in the Astrophysical Journal Letters. [Gregory A. Shields and Erin W. Bonning, A Captured Runaway Black Hole in NGC 1277?]

The paper’s authors note that the runaway black hole scenario requires the confluence of seemingly unlikely events. But the universe is a big place, where improbable things happen all the time. Look at you.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]  

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe