Health Data Could Spot Genocide Risk

Marginalized populations have more health problems related to poor nutrition and prenatal care. Tracking such data could identify groups at risk for future genocide. Cynthia Graber reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

It often takes military intervention to halt genocide. But health data also might help—by providing markers that show a population’s risk of being genocide victims.

Researchers at North Carolina State University examined skeletal remains of 142 males from the Srebenica massacre in 1995. Eight thousand Bosnian men and boys were killed there. The scientists found evidence of a number of diseases that are related to maternal malnutrition and poor prenatal care. One of them is spina bifida, which occurred in a higher proportion in this group and is related to poor nutrition.

The researchers were able to also compare these data to survivors of the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, and the numbers are consistent. The results seem to demonstrate that the victim population had been marginalized and denied access to nutrition and health care even before the genocide took place. The work will appear in the journal Forensic Science Policy and Management. [Ashley Maxwell and Ann H. Ross, "Epidemiology of Genocide: An Example from the Former Yugoslavia"]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The study authors say that this information gives another tool to politicians and international bodies. By evaluating the health of a given at-risk population, they may be able to identify a marginalized group, and mobilize international efforts to prevent a genocide from ever beginning.

—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe