Irresistible Antibiotics

A report in the journal Nature Chemical Biology shows that drugs that would merely incapacitate bacteria without killing them could be the key to avoiding the growing problem of antibiotic resistance. Karen Hopkin reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

Imagine antibiotics that would never lose their punch. New research focuses on drugs that bacteria simply can’t resist. Most antibiotics work by killing pathogens. The problem is, it’s hard to kill every single microbe. The rare ones that survive reproduce, often creating a population that’s antibiotic resistant.

But what if you could make a drug that renders bugs harmless, without actually killing them? In that scenario, bacteria might not evolve resistance. And that’s what researchers showed in the March 9th issue of Nature Chemical Biology.

The key is communication. In well-trained armies, commanders bark orders, and soldiers signal each other to coordinate their positions. The same is true for a lot of infectious bacteria, which hold off mounting a full assault—complete with toxins—until there are enough of them around.

The scientists designed three different compounds that jammed cell-to-cell signaling in bacteria that cause food poisoning and cholera. And they found that the bugs remained sensitive to drugs, even after 26 generations. They still need to confirm that the bugs that are silenced are in fact less deadly. If so, the new antibiotics would leave bacteria alive, but they’d basically be POWs. With no way to escape.

—Karen Hopkin 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast:

RSS | iTunes 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe