Leap Seconds May Disappear

This month the International Telecommunication Union will consider a proposal to abolish leap seconds. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Welcome to 2012—a leap year. The additional day in a leap year keeps the calendar in sync with the seasons. They're needed because Earth rotates more like 365-and-a-quarter times in one lap around the sun.

In fact, Earth's rotation isn't all that reliable. It fluctuates a bit from year to year, and it's gradually slowing down thanks to the braking effects of lunar tides.

So the world's timekeepers occasionally add leap seconds to what’s called coordinated universal time, or UTC. Leap seconds keep UTC synchronized with the rotation of the Earth and with the positions of celestial bodies. Two dozen leap seconds have been tacked on to UTC since the 1970s.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But that practice may soon end. This month the International Telecommunication Union will consider a proposal to abolish leap seconds. Without them, the argument goes, the world's clocks could tick along continuously without the need for ad hoc adjustments.

The downside is that UTC would no longer describe Earth's orientation with respect to the sun and other stars. By 2050 the clocks would differ from the true celestial time about by about 30 seconds. And for stargazers, that’s an astronomical difference.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe