Manuka Honey Slips Up Some Bacteria

Manuka honey interferes with bacteria infecting a wound by keeping the microbes from attaching to tissue, and even by making antibiotics more effective. Cynthia Graber reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Honey’s been a medicine since before medicine as we know it even existed. Its use was described on Sumerian clay tablets from nearly 4,000 years ago. Ancient Egyptians made ointments of honey to treat various injuries.

And honey’s been mixed into contemporary medicine as well, as a bacteria fighter. Now scientists have an idea about how honey fights some bacteria—and might help with antibiotic resistance. The work was presented at a Society for General Microbiology conference in England.

The researchers focused on manuka honey from New Zealand. This honey has already been incorporated into treatments for wound care.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers investigated the honey’s activities versus three bacterial species that commonly infect wounds. Turns out that the manuka honey keeps some bacteria from being able to attach themselves to tissue. It also hampers bacteria from forming biofilms, which bacteria use as protection from antibiotics.

They also learned that found that manuka honey can make the dreaded MRSA more susceptible to antibiotics. Which could help reverse the bacteria’s resistance. If these initial findings hold, honey could find a new role as part of a one–two punch of drugs and the sweet stuff to combat infection.

—Cynthia Graber

[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe