New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Mars Rover Prepares for 7 Minutes of Terror

The Curiosity rover is set to begin exploring Mars on August 6. But first it has to land. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Big rover, big-deal landing.

Mars should soon have a new resident. On August 6th, NASA’s latest rover, Curiosity, is scheduled to arrive. Curiosity is the size of a compact car, and it’s fully loaded—with an unprecedented collection of science instruments.

But before those instruments get put to work comes Curiosity’s descent and landing process sequence—what’s being called the “seven minutes of terror.” It includes parachutes, landing rockets and a hovering sky crane to lower the rover to the surface.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


At a July 16th news conference, NASA’s Doug McCuistion tackled the obvious question: “Is it crazy? Well, Not so much. Once you understand it, it’s not a crazy concept. It works. Is it risky? Landing on Mars is always risky. There are hundreds of discrete events that occur, from release of the cruise stage to parachute deployments to heat shield deployments. All of these are unique, and any one could cause problems. We go from 13,000 miles an hour to zero in seven minutes. That’s quite a challenge in itself. And then there’s the unknown, there’s Mars. Mars throws things at you: dust storms, atmospheric density changes, wind. So it’s a very unique and a very challenging environement.”

If all those challenges are met, the rover should help settle the question of whether Mars once had conditions favorable for life. Thus satisfying Curiosity.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe