Milky Way Makes Small Massive Gain

Based on the Milky Way's effect on the motion of a nearby dwarf galaxy, our galaxy seems to have more mass than we previously thought. John Matson reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Weighing the Milky Way is no easy task. It’s not like you can just step outside the galaxy and place it on a humongous scale.

Plus, most of the galaxy’s heft is in invisible dark matter, which betrays its presence only through its gravitational pull. So astronomers have devised clever ways of inferring the mass of our galaxy by measuring how it pulls on smaller objects moving around it.

A new estimate, based on its effect on the motion of a nearby dwarf galaxy, has the Milky Way a bit beefier than some past measurements that relied on the motions of massive stars. The study is in the Astrophysical Journal. [Michael Boylan-Kolchin et al., The Space Motion of Leo I: The Mass of the Milky Way's Dark Matter Halo] (free preprint)


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The researchers first used the Hubble Space Telescope to track the dwarf galaxy Leo I, which at 850,000 light-years away is one of the most distant of the satellite galaxies swarming around the Milky Way. Then they simulated galaxies able to host such an object. Turns out that anything less massive than one trillion suns is very unlikely. In fact, the researchers estimate that the Milky Way’s dark matter has as much mass as 1.6 trillion suns. That’s some pretty heavy-duty astrophysics.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe