No Sex Please, We're Cloners

Critters that reproduce by cloning still manage to develop genetic diversity, which gives natural selection something to work on. Karen Hopkin reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

Why bother with sex? It’s a question that’s bugged biologists since they first noticed that some critters do it and some don’t. The answer they’ve come up with is that sex generates genetic diversity, which could allow a species to better adapt to changing environments. That’s because sex mixes together the genes from mom and dad. And, like shuffling a deck of cards and dealing new hands, sometimes the kids will get a better combination of genes than their parents had.


So how do species that reproduce by cloning weather change? It turns out not all clones are alike. Scientists from Melbourne were studying a kind of mite that reproduces asexually. In the process, sometimes rare mutations occur, so a clone might be a little different from its parent, and from the rest of the population.


What the scientists found is that sometimes these rare mutants are favored by natural selection. Maybe they’re a little better at hiding from predators. So they leave behind more offspring, and eventually come to dominate the population. When circumstances change, another rare mutant might gain favor, results that appear in the current issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. So sex isn’t necessary, as long as you’re willing to back somebody different when it’s time for a change.

—Karen Hopkin 

60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast:

RSS | iTunes

 

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe