New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Nobelist Talks about Exercise and Chromosome Integrity

In a Google Hangout Nobel laureate Elizabeth Blackburn and Scientific American Editor in Chief Mariette DiChristina discuss the relationship between exercise and telomere length, which is related to diseases of aging

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Telomeres are parts of chromosomes that protect the ends of the chromosomes. They’re often likened to the aglets at the ends of shoelaces. And like aglets eventually crack, telomeres tend to get shorter over time, with each division of the cell. But they can be topped off again by an enzyme called telomerase reverse transcriptase. Various age-related diseases are associated with shortened telomeres.

Elizabeth Blackburn won a Nobel Prize for her discoveries about telomeres and the telomerase enzyme. She recently did a Google Hangout with Scientific American editor-in-chief Mariette DiChristina, which included taking questions from attendees via social media:

MD: “Can telomeres actually grow longer in response to exercise?”

EB: “Well, we don’t know if telomeres actually grow with exercise. But what is known, I’ll give you a great example of a study. We didn’t do it. Twins. So they looked at twins. This is a big study. And they said, of the twins who’ve actually done exercise, the one who did exercise and the one who didn’t, so you’d be able to find a lot of twins it turns out, in that situation. And they said, who’s got the longer telomeres. And it was the twin who did some exercise. The one who didn’t had shorter telomeres. And yet their genes are the same. So you see, that tells you something quite nice.

“And of course, well, you say, was it really the exercise, or was it something else that was different between the twins. And that’s where epidemiology studies have to be done so carefully. But over and over again, we keep finding that same result—that the exercise is associated with a person who will have less telomere shortening. And so it looks like now it really is the exercise that’s somehow keeping the shortening process from being too fast.”

The entire 27-minute Google Hangout with Mariette DiChristina and Nobel Laureate Elizabeth Blackburn is on our Web site. Just google Hangout and Elizabeth Blackburn.

—Steve Mirsky

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
 

Mariette DiChristina, Steering Group chair, is dean and professor of the practice in journalism at the Boston University College of Communication. She was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American and executive vice president, Magazines, for Springer Nature.

More by Mariette DiChristina

Steve Mirsky was the winner of a Twist contest in 1962, for which he received three crayons and three pieces of construction paper. It remains his most prestigious award.

More by Steve Mirsky

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe