Old Skeletons Hold DNA Clues to TB

Scientists hope to learn tuberculosis's genetic secrets by examining TB genes in old bones and comparing them with other strains from the past and present. Katherine Harmon reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Tuberculosis killed 1.4 million people last year. One reason TB is so deadly is that TB bacteria mutate quickly. But some scientists are hoping to get a step ahead of TB's changes in the future by studying its past evolution.  

Remnants of TB genes can remain in an infected person's bones for centuries. A team of U.K. researchers has been able to isolate such TB sequences from an old skeleton using new rapid DNA sequencing. The proof-of-concept exercise was performed using the remains of a young woman buried in the 1800s.

DNA sequencing showed that her strain matched one that circulated in the U.S. a century ago. That match was based on tissue samples collected from a TB patient in upstate New York in 1905. The findings are in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Abigail Bouwman et al, Genotype of a historic strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Once older bones can be studied for these telltale genes, scientists might be able to get new insights into TB’s deadly moves. And perhaps anticipate its next one.

—Katherine Harmon

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe