Planets with Stabilizing Moons May Be Common
Computer simulations show that about 10 percent of planets could have a massive moon that helps to stabilize the planetary tilt. John Matson reports
SUBSCRIBE TO 60-Second Space
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
We Earthlings owe a lot to the moon, and not just for its romantic appeal. The moon locks in Earth's tilt, which would otherwise be a bit wobbly. That in turn stabilizes Earth's climate, which is good for nurturing life. Without Earth's lunar companion, we might not be here.
The moon apparently formed from debris kicked up by a Mars-size object colliding with the young Earth. But the other terrestrial planets missed out. Venus doesn't have a moon. Neither does Mercury. Mars has two pebbles that barely qualify. So is Earth just an outlier, a freak cosmic arrangement of planet and moon that makes for a nice, life-enabling climate?
Not exactly. A team of researchers simulated the formation of hundreds of planets. And they found that nearly half of them experience giant impacts that produce a stabilizing moon. Almost 10 percent wind up with a massive moon comparable to our own. The research appears in the journal Icarus. [Sebastian Elser et al., "How Common Are Earth–Moon Planetary Systems?"]
That means that if Earth-like planets exist in large numbers throughout the galaxy, at least some of them ought to enjoy the benefits of a moon. Romantic and otherwise.
—John Matson
[The above text is an exact transcript of this podcast.]
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
