January 23, 2012

Point Up and Click

The 2012 Astronomy Photographer of the Year competition is now accepting entries. John Matson reports

SUBSCRIBE TO 60-Second Space

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Seems like everyone's a photographer these days. Digital technology has put high-caliber photo equipment is in the hands of countless amateur enthusiasts. But astrophotography remains a bit more specialized. It takes a unique skill set and the right equipment to produce a stunning image of another planet or even another galaxy.

If you're among those dedicated to the art and science of astrophotography, now's your chance to see how your best work stacks up. The 2012 Astronomy Photographer of the Year competition is now accepting entries via a Flickr group.

The contest is hosted by the Royal Observatory Greenwich and Sky at Night magazine in the U.K. It's now in its fourth year. Entrants have until June to submit their work. A panel of astronomers, artists and science journalists then picks the winners.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Last year's grand prize went to Damian Peach of the U.K., who took a stunning shot of Jupiter and its moons Io and Ganymede through a 14-inch home telescope.

The competition has a number of subcategories, including an under-16 division. Details on the contest and winning photos from last year are at rmg.co.uk/astrophoto. Maybe you can be a shooting star.

—John Matson

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American