New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Road Runoff a No-No for Coho

Researchers have found the first direct evidence that coho salmon near U.S. Northwest cities are being killed by chemical runoff from roads and parking lots that reach streams

 

Marvin Beatty©iStock.com

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Each fall, thousands of coho salmon flock to Northwest rivers to spawn. But many never get the chance, especially near big cities like Seattle. “And in some of these urban areas, up to 90 percent of the females were dying before they spawned, which is not a good thing for a population long term.” Julann Spromberg, a toxicologist affiliated with the Northwest Fisheries Science Center.

Researchers suspected these deaths were partly a matter of bad timing. The fish often reach streams during the first showers of the rainy season, which flush chemicals from roads and parking lots into the water. Now, Spromberg and her colleagues have produced the first direct evidence that this runoff kills coho salmon. Their study is in the Journal of Applied Ecology. [Julann A. Spromberg et al, Coho salmon spawner mortality in western US urban watersheds: bioinfiltration prevents lethal storm water impacts]

The researchers found that fish exposed to storm water from Seattle-area highways quickly grew sick and died. Surprisingly, though, the salmon did not seem to mind taking a dip in a cocktail of common road pollutants, including hydrocarbons and metals. That detail suggests the killer ingredient in runoff may be a different kind of chemical or a lethal combination of several compounds.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“There’s a whole lot of stuff in here that we haven’t been able to measure or don’t have the capabilities of measuring at this point.”

However, Spromberg says there’s a way to help the fish even before scientists hunt down the culprit. Her team also found that filtering runoff through just a few feet of soil made storm water safe for salmon. Cities can implement this simple form of clean water technology by building more systems, including roadside rain gardens, to collect runoff from paved areas and pass it through soil before it enters urban waterways. Literally a quick and dirty solution.

—Julia Rosen

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe