Searching the Heavens for Mountains

Exoplanet hunters are moving beyond simply finding new planets into trying to know what they look like and whether there's surface or subsurface activity.

 

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In the last few decades, astronomers have discovered thousands of exoplanets orbiting other stars. Now, scientists want to know what they look like. Do they have oceans? Atmospheres? Researchers have even searched for signs of plant life and the glow of alien city lights—although they haven’t found any yet.

“We’ve moved on from being excited about finding exoplanets to now having to get our kicks out of characterizing them.”

Moiya McTier, a graduate student at Columbia University and the host of the podcast So You Think You Can Science.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Last year, McTier’s advisor challenged her to find something else on exoplanets: evidence of extraterrestrial mountains. Because mountains could offer clues about what’s going on inside these planets.

“The way that those form is through the collision of tectonic plates or through lava building up in the same place over millions of years. And so that’s one of the most exciting things, in my opinion, that can come out of this project, is actually being able to figure out what’s underneath the surface of an exoplanet.”

The trick was how to do it. Modern telescopes are powerful, but they can’t capture pictures of exoplanets. Instead, a common way astronomers detect them is by watching as they pass in front of their star, blotting out some of the light. McTier riffed on this idea to find a way to look for mountains.

“And so, what we are doing with this mountains project is saying, okay, if a planet has a mountain on it and if that planet is rotating, then the mountain will show up in silhouette. And the silhouette will change, because the planet’s rotating. So, we can study that changing silhouette—that changing shadow—to get an idea of what the surface of the planet looks like.”

McTier tested the technique by modeling how the rocky planets of our solar system would look through modern telescopes like the James Webb if they were far away.

“And we were pretty heartbroken when found out that it wouldn’t be possible.”

But McTier calculated that it might be doable with something like the Extremely Large Telescope, which is currently under construction in Chile. Even this telescope probably wouldn’t be able to measure the topography of a Mars-like body if it orbited a large star like our Sun. But if that planet circled a smaller star, like a white dwarf, it would block out enough light to be detectible. The research is in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. [Moyia A. S. McTier and David M. Kipping, Finding mountains with molehills: the detectability of exotopography]  

So, one day soon we may be able to confirm the existence of exoplanetary mountains. And with even better telescopes, maybe molehills. Or even moles.

—Julia Rosen

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe