Cities Befriend Select Plants and Animals

As more people move to cities, careful planning could mean a happy home for both humans and a substantial amount of wildlife. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The concrete jungle is no tropical rainforest. Replacing trees with buildings means a loss of more than 90 percent of bird species. But a new survey suggests megalopolises aren't quite the homogenous ecosystems you might think.
 
Yes, meadow grass and pigeons can now be found from Nairobi to New York. But so can hundreds of other bird species, most specific to their locale and some even once endangered. Like the peregrine falcons that have become so popular in Gotham they even have their own Webcam.

That's according to a new survey of cities and wildlife in 36 countries published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B. [Myla F. J. Aronson et al., A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers]

Cities aren't just for the birds. Thousands of plant species thrive in cities worldwide, especially in green spaces. Some ecologists even call that the Central Park Effect, because of the surprising density of plants and animals found in that patch. Street trees matter too, especially in a city like Singapore that hosts the greatest number of endangered bird and plant species.
 
And species can be brought back with a little careful planning, like those aforementioned falcons. That means it's in our power to make cities not only a great place for people to live, but a home for wildlife, too.

—David Biello

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast]  

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe