New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Cities Befriend Select Plants and Animals

As more people move to cities, careful planning could mean a happy home for both humans and a substantial amount of wildlife. David Biello reports

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The concrete jungle is no tropical rainforest. Replacing trees with buildings means a loss of more than 90 percent of bird species. But a new survey suggests megalopolises aren't quite the homogenous ecosystems you might think.
 
Yes, meadow grass and pigeons can now be found from Nairobi to New York. But so can hundreds of other bird species, most specific to their locale and some even once endangered. Like the peregrine falcons that have become so popular in Gotham they even have their own Webcam.

That's according to a new survey of cities and wildlife in 36 countries published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B. [Myla F. J. Aronson et al., A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers]

Cities aren't just for the birds. Thousands of plant species thrive in cities worldwide, especially in green spaces. Some ecologists even call that the Central Park Effect, because of the surprising density of plants and animals found in that patch. Street trees matter too, especially in a city like Singapore that hosts the greatest number of endangered bird and plant species.
 
And species can be brought back with a little careful planning, like those aforementioned falcons. That means it's in our power to make cities not only a great place for people to live, but a home for wildlife, too.

—David Biello

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast]  

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe