New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Wanted: Gravitational Constant's True Value

Scientists from numerous disciplines will brainstorm new strategies for measuring "Big G" in July.

 

PhotoDisc/Getty Images (MARS)

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[Audio from movie]

A scene from the movie Gravity. In real life, gravity is always bringing us down—particularly scientists who attempt to measure gravitational force. Try as they might, physicists cannot agree on a precise value of the constant called “Big G,” which denotes the strength of gravity. It’s tough to measure because gravity is incredibly weak compared to other fundamental forces.

“Big G is a fundamental constant of nature, and as such, I think it is important to measure its value precisely.” Stephan Schlamminger of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.  


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The world’s best experiments keep turning up different answers that are incompatible with one another and diverge by about 40 times the uncertainty of the most precise experiment.

The discrepancy is not just embarrassing—knowing the true value of Big G is important in various fields. For example, in efforts to unify general relativity with quantum mechanics in a quantum theory of gravity.

 Aiming to solve the problem, Schlamminger is organizing an “Ideas Lab” gathering under the auspices of the National Science Foundation in July. Scientists from numerous disciplines will brainstorm new strategies for measuring Big G.

“First, I hope for a really good and new idea on how to measure big G. Completely new ideas are rare, and this wish may not get fulfilled. However, when you have a new idea, they can advance the solution to a given problem a lot…short of that, I hope that new collaborations form to tackle this problem…this will infuse new energy in the field, and there are many fascinating questions that need to be answered…and in the ideal best case we get a new, high-precision determination of big G.”

—Clara Moskowitz

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Clara Moskowitz is chief of reporters at Scientific American, where she covers astronomy, space, physics and mathematics. She has been at Scientific American for more than a decade; previously she worked at Space.com. Moskowitz has reported live from rocket launches, space shuttle liftoffs and landings, suborbital spaceflight training, mountaintop observatories, and more. She has a bachelor’s degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University and a graduate degree in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.

More by Clara Moskowitz

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe