New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

What’s a Narwhal’s Tusk For?

Although the tusk can be a weapon, the variation in tusk length among animals of similar body size points to it being primarily a mating status signal.

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Deep beneath the frozen surface of the Arctic swims a sea unicorn. In reality, it’s a whale with a spiral tusk sprouting from its head—the narwhal. Biologists have long debated the purpose of male narwhals’ tusks. The tusk, like those of elephants, are actually elongated teeth. And since narwhals are usually below the sea ice, it’s tough to see how they use their tusk.

“It turns out we don’t know pretty much anything about them, because they’re impossible to study in the wild.”

Arizona State University evolutionary biology graduate student Zackary Graham. He wondered if the males’ tusks were a sign of status as a potential reproductive partner. Comparing tusk size to the whales’ overall body size could provide evidence.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“One of the main trends that has been documented in over 100 different animals is disproportionate growth. We call that hyperallometry. All that means is that the sexual trait is growing disproportionately, compared to the rest of the body. So it’s not like the biggest narwhal is just a scaled up version of a baby narwhal. What we see is that the tusk is disproportionately long. And then we also see that there is intensive variation.”

So Graham and his team turned to measurements collected from 250 adult males over 35 years.

“The majority of them are from the Inuit hunt. So the Inuit have been killing narwhals for thousands and thousands of years. And any time they do that, the Greenland Institute of Natural Resources asks them to collect a bunch of data.”

Turns out the length of the tusks can vary widely even for males the same size, ranging from a foot and a half to more than eight feet. The finding is in the journal Biology Letters. [Zackary A. Graham et al., The longer the better: Evidence that narwhal tusks are sexually selected]

The top tusks thus appear to be like a billboard that shouts, “Look at me. I’m the biggest.” After all, only the strongest, best fed individuals can afford to produce such an ostentatious ornament. Of course, tusks can do more than just say, “Hey, how you doin’?”

“But the fact that these narwhals always have these scars on them makes us think that it’s likely a communication structure that also functions as a weapon.”

For Graham, there’s also a larger issue: some evolutionary biologists have recently proposed a hypothesis that groups of animals with elaborate sexual signals are more likely to speciate and diversify than those without.

“We know the world is changing around us more than ever, so understanding how and why species are going to be able to adapt and deal with this is key if we are to protect and manage the species we have on earth today.”

—Jason G. Goldman

[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]

Jason G. Goldman is a science journalist based in Los Angeles. He has written about animal behavior, wildlife biology, conservation, and ecology for Scientific American, Los Angeles magazine, the Washington Post, the Guardian, the BBC, Conservation magazine, and elsewhere. He contributes to Scientific American's "60-Second Science" podcast, and is co-editor of Science Blogging: The Essential Guide (Yale University Press). He enjoys sharing his wildlife knowledge on television and on the radio, and often speaks to the public about wildlife and science communication.

More by Jason G. Goldman

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe