Why a Bio-Duck?
The source of the mysterious so-called "bio-duck" sounds in the Southern Ocean is finally revealed by researchers engaged in minke business. Sophie Bushwick reports
By Sophie Bushwick
SUBSCRIBE TO Science Quickly
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
In the 1960s submarine teams in the Southern Ocean first heard [recording of odd sound]. The sound reminded the submariners of a duck. So they dubbed the mysterious sound the bio-duck. Since then, scientists have frequently recorded the bio-duck sound in Antarctic waters. But its source remained unknown. Until now.
In 2013 researchers attached sensors to two Antarctic minke whales. The tags could track depth and location—and also record vocalizations. Over a combined total of 26 hours, 32 calls were captured—including some low-pitched pulses. Some of which matched recordings made nearby of the bio-duck sound. The minke whale is thus revealed to be the source of the decades-old unidentified bio-duckitude. The work is in the journal Biology Letters. [Denise Risch et al, Mysterious bio-duck sound attributed to the Antarctic minke whale (Balaenoptera bonaerensis)]
Because minke whales swim in icy Antarctic waters, they're difficult to monitor, especially in winter. But by analyzing the collection of bio-duck sounds recorded over the decades, researchers may now be able to track their population size and migration patterns. But perhaps the bigger lesson: if it quacks like a duck...maybe it’s a whale.
—Sophie Bushwick
[The above text is a transcript of this podcast.]
Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism
Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.
When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.
Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber
