New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Widespread Vaccination Keeps Unvaccinated Flu-Free

Getting flu shots to more people, especially health care workers in geriatric facilities, also keeps unvaccinated people safer. Karen Hopkin reports

Illustration of a Bohr atom model spinning around the words Science Quickly with various science and medicine related icons around the text

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

[The following is an exact transcript of this podcast.]

When it comes to flu shots, the more the merrier. Happily, that doesn’t mean you need to get jabbed more than once. What it does mean, according to two reports in the Public Library of Science journal Medicine, is that the vaccines are more effective when more people get them. Because each vaccinated person is like a roadblock that cuts off further infections.

In the fall of 2000 Canadians launched a unique vaccination scheme. Instead of targeting the people most at risk—children and seniors—they offered everyone in Ontario a free flu shot. They even gave them out at the local mall. Now, scientists in Toronto have analyzed the results of that experiment. They compared what flu season was like in Ontario before and after the year 2000. And they found that the universal vaccination program resulted in fewer flu-related deaths, and fewer trips to the doctor’s office and the hospital.

But people over 75 didn’t seem to benefit. And now Dutch scientists say that one thing that could help seniors is fully immunizing nursing home staff. Their mathematical study showed that keeping the staff flu-free could in turn cut infections in the residents by more than half. So roll up your sleeve, if not for yourself for your neighbors and your grandpa.

—Karen Hopkin 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


60-Second Science is a daily podcast. Subscribe to this Podcast:

RSS | iTunes 

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe