This Astrophysicist Makes Stellar Nurseries That Fit in the Palm of Your Hand

How artist and astrophysicist Nia Imara makes 3-D prints of the birth of stars

Nia Imara: My being an artist very much affects my view of the world. And it bleeds into everything, including my science. For me, science is about the search from the outside in. Whereas art is the search from the inside out. One of the connections between art and science is storytelling. One of the outstanding mysteries of star formation is how stellar nurseries are born and how they evolve. I’m Dr. Nia Imara.

I'm an astrophysicist and an artist and this is how stars are born. Stellar nurseries are incredibly complex, and they have this beautiful, intricate structure weaving throughout them. We know that that structure is intimately tied to the birth of stars. But how that structure itself forms and evolves is still a mystery. Stellar nurseries are enormous. They have tens of thousands of solar masses' worth of gas and dust.

And they stretch for tens, if not hundreds of light-years across. When you look toward the constellation of Orion, just below the belt and stretching above the belt are two of the closest stellar nurseries to us. The Orion stellar nurseries are just about 1,400 lightyears away, which is just our backyard for astronomers.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The Orions are two of the largest, most massive stellar nurseries, and that’s the closest region of massive star formation. A star is born when vast regions of interstellar gas and dust come together over the course of millions of years. Eventually, some regions within those clouds of gas and dust undergo gravitational collapse, becoming so dense that eventually nuclear fusion kicks in. And when that happens, a star is born.

I once did a sketch of myself touching a star, and several years later, I was reading something about 3D printing. Well, part of the challenge with astronomy is that images are inherently flat. Much of that information is collapsed onto one plane. When we're dealing with structures that are much more complicated than spheres like stars and planets, it can become really challenging to interpret what's going on. And so it's really important for us to find clever ways to be able to visualize the structure of stellar nurseries. 3-D models uniquely tap into the human brain’s ability to detect patterns. And so that was the idea behind the 3D printing was to have a new way of visualizing stellar nurseries — visual. 

These sorts of visualizations don't have to compete with our traditional images. It's just a new way seeing things and hopefully thinking about things. Each of these prints represents a stellar nursery that may be tens or even 100 light-years across. The white material represents the dense gas, the filaments, where the stars are going to be born, and the clear material represents the voids of interstellar space. Each of the prints is about the size of a softball, consisting of thousands of layers, each thinner than a piece of paper.

Now, most astronomers hate dust; dust can dim the light from background stars and galaxies that we're trying to observe. But I love dust. Stellar nurseries are dusty. And we can use our knowledge of dust to understand the structure of molecular clouds. Stellar nurseries are threaded by these long, dense noodlelike structures called filaments. Embedded within filaments are these compact knots of gas called cores — the final stage before star formation. My collaborators and I ran several computer simulations, nine in total, each representing different physical extremes. So one simulation might have had stronger gravity; another simulation might have had stronger or weaker magnetic fields.

And the whole idea here was to be able to get a sense of how the different physics operating in interstellar space shape the environment of stellar nurseries that eventually go on to form stars. And really, one of the most challenging parts of this research is getting the computer simulations right. We're able to get a much better understanding of the physics that shaping star formation.

The link between humanity and the cosmos: we literally come from the stars. That means we have a common origin, a common destiny. And when you really think about it, we're all responsible for each other. The link between art and science for me is my love of color and my love of light. When I think about how Black and brown people have been making major contributions to the sciences and the arts for millennia, I think about people like Benjamin Banneker, George Washington Carver, brilliant scientists and artists who served people with their science and really changed how people think about what a scientist is and what a scientist can be.

[The above is a transcript of this video] 

Jason Drakeford is a documentary filmmaker, video journalist and educator telling true, impactful stories with motion graphics and cinematic visuals.

More by Jason Drakeford

Kelso Harper is an award-winning senior multimedia editor at Scientific American. As a producer, editor and host, they work on short documentaries, social videos and Scientific American’s podcast Science Quickly. They have a bachelor’s degree in chemistry from Johns Hopkins University and a master’s degree in science writing from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Previously, they worked with Wired, Science, Popular Mechanics, and MIT News. Follow them on LinkedIn and Instagram.

More by Kelso Harper

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe