New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

50, 100 & 150 Years Ago: January 2020  

Entertainment technology over the past 175 years 

1870: A patented (and mostly superfluous) reading stand.

Scientific American, Vol. XXII, No. 2; January 8, 1870.

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

1970

Rules of Chemical Warfare

“President Nixon’s announcement concerning chemical and biological weapons renounced germ warfare and the first use of lethal and ‘incapacitating’ chemical weapons. The statement did not, however, change U.S. policy on two major weapons currently in routine use in Vietnam: tear gas and chemical defoliants. With regard to biological warfare the renunciation was unilateral and unequivocal. The President indicated that biological-warfare research would be confined to defensive measures and that the U.S. stockpile of bacteriological weapons would be destroyed.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


1920

Stamp Licking

“A discussion of ‘The Postage Stamp as a Possible Source of Infection’ appears in the Medical Times for October, 1919. Laboratory tests showed that no stamp was free from germs. Among the germs were colon bacilli, staphylococci, streptococci, pneumococci and diphtheroid bacilli. The amount of danger presented by these organisms cannot be stated, as, unfortunately, no tests were made to determine the virulence of the germs. In commenting on these results, American Medicine, while not encouraging the common practice of moistening stamps with the tongue, points out that if stamps were a grave source of infection a very large percentage of the population would undoubtedly be suffering from infections due to this cause.”

1870

Reading Technology

“The improvement we herewith illustrate will be found a luxury which few, either sick or well, having once enjoyed, will be willing to resign. These devices enable reading either while a person is sitting or reclining, so that the printed matter is placed directly in front of the eyes, and in such a position that no muscular effort is required to sustain the book or to keep the body in a position of restraint. This invention was patented through the Scientific American Patent Agency, by Edward Conley, of Cincinnati, Ohio.”

Petroleum Furnaces

“Henri St.-Claire Deville was instructed by the French Academy to conduct a series of experiments upon this important subject, and he has succeeded in inventing a furnace that satisfactorily accomplishes the object. This may safely be regarded as one of the most important inventions of the year.”

Epic Tales

Technology of Entertainment

Digital entertainment: “personal theater” from 2000. Credit: Scientific American, Vol. 283, No. 5; November 2000; Terry Renna AP Photo

By the late 19th century reading for fun had become popular because of advances in the art of the novel, cheaper paper and mass printing, and more leisure time. The patented reading stand we illustrated above probably had zero effect. Another technology leap was the phonograph (you know, like a record player). Thomas Edison wrote in our issue of May 18, 1878, that he thought it would be good for dictation in the office, but allowed it could be “liberally devoted to music.” In 1906 radio broadcasting for entertainment began; by July 1925 we advocated bringing your radio while camping “far from the madding crowd.” The April 1939 issue proclaimed “Here Comes Television!”—with “entertainment” as top priority. Inventions often need other practical inputs to transform society: our modern entertainment emerged after we harnessed the power of the computer, the Internet and the smartphone, then commercialized a way to provide (and pay for!) content viewable or playable on these gizmos. By November 2000 we knew “digitizing everything audio and video will disrupt the entertainment industry's social order.”

Scientific American Magazine Vol 322 Issue 1This article was published with the title “50, 100 & 150 Years Ago” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 322 No. 1 (), p. 67
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0120-67a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe