New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Are the James Webb Space Telescope’s Pictures ‘Real’?

How the JWST’s cosmic images are made

Detail from an image that presents JWST data from 4 different infrared filters (each assigned blue, green, orange or red).

Jen Christiansen (graphic); NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI and Webb ERO Production Team (image source)

As light travels through space, it gets stretched by the expansion of the universe. This is why many of the most distant objects shine in infrared light, which is longer in wavelength than visible light. We can't see this ancient light with our eyes, but the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) was designed to capture it, revealing some of the first galaxies ever to form.

Credit: Jen Christiansen

Integrated Science Instrument Module


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


JWST’s core includes four science instruments, described below, that collect its data.

Credit: Jen Christiansen

Six Data Collection Components . . .

Aperture Masking: A perforated metal plate blocks some of the light entering the telescope, allowing it to simulate an interferometer, which combines data from multiple telescopes to achieve higher resolution than a single lens. The technique reveals more details of very bright objects close together, such as two stars nearby on the sky.

Micro Shutter Array: A grid of 248,000 small doors can open or close to measure spectra—light spread into its constituent wavelengths—from up to 100 points in a single frame.

Spectrographs: Gratings or prisms separate incoming light into spectra to reveal the intensity of individual wavelengths.

Cameras: JWST has three cameras—two that capture light in the near-infrared wavelength range and one that works in the mid-infrared.

Integral Field Unit: A combined camera and spectrograph captures an image, along with spectra for each pixel, revealing how the light varies across the field of view.

Coronagraphs: Glare from bright stars can blot out fainter light from planets and debris disks orbiting those stars. Coronagraphs are opaque circles that block that bright starlight to let the weaker signals through.

Credit: Jen Christiansen

. . . Distributed across Four Instruments

Fine Guidance Sensor (FGS)/Near-InfraRed Imager and Slitless Spectrograph (NIRISS): The FGS is a guide camera that helps to point the telescope in the right direction. It’s packaged together with the NIRISS, which has a camera and a spectrograph to take images and spectra in the near-infrared range.

Credit: Jen Christiansen (graphic); NASA; ESA; STScI; Andi James and J. Olmsted, STScI (references)

Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec): This dedicated spectrograph can capture 100 spectra simultaneously with its micro shutter array. It’s the first space instrument capable of taking spectroscopy for so many objects at once.

Credit: Jen Christiansen (graphic); NASA; ESA; STScI; Andi James and J. Olmsted, STScI (references)

Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam): The only near-infrared instrument with a coronagraph, NIRCam will be a key instrument for studying exoplanets whose light would otherwise be drowned out by their nearby star’s glare. It will capture high-resolution images and spectra in the near-infrared.

Credit: Jen Christiansen (graphic); NASA; ESA; STScI; Andi James and J. Olmsted, STScI (references)

Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI): This combination camera and spectrograph is JWST’s only instrument capable of seeing in the mid-infrared, where cooler objects such as debris disks around stars and extremely distant galaxies emit their light.

Credit: Jen Christiansen (graphic); NASA; ESA; STScI; Andi James and J. Olmsted, STScI (references)

Are the Pictures “Real”?

Scientists have to make adjustments to turn JWST’s raw data into something human eyes can appreciate, but its photos are “real,” says Alyssa Pagan, science visuals developer for the Space Telescope Science Institute. “Is this exactly what we’d see if we were there? The answer to that is no because our eyes are not built to see in infrared, and also the telescope is far more sensitive to light than our eyes.” In that sense, the telescope’s enhanced vision gives us a truer representation of what these cosmic objects look like than our relatively limited eyes could do. JWST can take images in up to 27 filters that capture different ranges of the infrared spectrum. Scientists first isolate the most useful dynamic range for a given image and scale the brightness values to unlock the most details. They then assign each infrared filter a color from the visible range of the spectrum—the shortest wavelengths get blue, and longer wavelengths move to green and red. After these are added together, all that’s left are the normal white balancing, contrast and color adjustments that any photographer might make.

Credit: Jen Christiansen (graphic); NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI and Webb ERO Production Team (image source)

Data Details

Although the full-color images are captivating, many of the exciting discoveries show up one wavelength at a time. Here the NIRSpec instrument reveals different features of the Tarantula Nebula via different filters. The wavelength emitted by atomic hydrogen (blue), for instance, comes from a central star as well as from a bubble surrounding it. In between are the signatures of molecular hydrogen (green) and complex hydrocarbons (red). The data suggest that a cluster of stars in the frame’s lower right is blowing a front of dust and gas toward the central star.

Credit: Jen Christiansen (graphic); NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI and Webb ERO Production Team (image source)

Jen Christiansen is an information designer, visual science communicator and author of the book Building Science Graphics: An Illustrated Guide to Communicating Science through Diagrams and Visualizations. She began her publishing career in New York City at Scientific American, moved to Washington, D.C., to join the art department of National Geographic, spent four years as a freelance science communicator and then returned to Scientific American for a second stint, during which she became the magazine’s first graphics-specific art director. In that role, she established a consistent data visualization and diagram philosophy across all articles. She writes and presents on topics ranging from reconciling her love for art and science to her quest to learn more about the pulsar chart on Joy Division’s Unknown Pleasures album cover. Her work can be viewed at www.jenchristiansen.com

More by Jen Christiansen

Clara Moskowitz is chief of reporters at Scientific American, where she covers astronomy, space, physics and mathematics. She has been at Scientific American for more than a decade; previously she worked at Space.com. Moskowitz has reported live from rocket launches, space shuttle liftoffs and landings, suborbital spaceflight training, mountaintop observatories, and more. She has a bachelor’s degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University and a graduate degree in science communication from the University of California, Santa Cruz.

More by Clara Moskowitz
Scientific American Magazine Vol 327 Issue 6This article was published with the title “Behind the Pictures” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 327 No. 6 (), p. 42
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1222-42

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe