Astronomers discover another galaxy seemingly devoid of dark matter

A galaxy appears to be missing the invisible substance thought to hold these objects together, further challenging long-held assumptions about how galaxies form

A close-up Hubble image of DF9 is shown beneath a wider view of the surrounding NGC 1052 region. Blue boxes highlight a line of related galaxies, including DF2 and DF4. Red outlines show where Keck Observatory’s KCWI instrument collected data, while yellow circles mark galaxy clusters whose motions have already been measured. Both images are oriented along the direction of the galactic structure.

A close-up Hubble image of DF9 is shown beneath a wider view of the surrounding NGC 1052 region.

Credit: Keim et al./DECaLS/HST

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

NASA calls dark matter the glue that holds the universe together—but the evidence is mounting that, at least in some galaxies, dark matter isn’t so necessary. A new study led by astronomers at Yale University has identified a galaxy that appears to contain almost no dark matter at all. This is the third galaxy of its kind to be found—two other galaxies have been previously discovered devoid of the elusive adhesive.

This new galaxy, named DF9, was found lurking in the same thin chain of galaxies as the first two, although it is some 100 times dimmer. Using an instrument called the Cosmic Web Imager, researchers measured the motions of stars within the galaxy and used those motions to estimate its mass. The result suggests that this galaxy contains little, if any, dark matter.

Dark matter is notoriously difficult to detect because it doesn't interact with light. We can't see it directly, but scientists infer its presence from its gravitational effects. The process is a bit like tracking an invisible person by their footprints in the snow. Dark matter leaves “footprints” in the motions of stars and galaxies, which often move as though they contain far more mass than we can see.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That’s how dark matter was detected in the first place: Astronomers noticed that galaxies seemed to be carrying around a great deal of invisible baggage. Many scientists believe it is critical to the fabric of the universe, although some physicists disagree that it exists at all.

For those who do accept dark matter, galaxies like DF9 present a different puzzle: Why is the dark matter missing? One leading explanation is that these galaxies were forged in violent collisions between two much larger galaxies. So violent that ordinary matter would have separated from dark matter, resulting in these dark matter-devoid objects.

This galaxy may be the latest piece of evidence from that ancient cosmic pileup.

“Almost every galaxy in the universe is dominated by dark matter. But DF2, DF4, and now DF9 appear to be extraordinary exceptions,” said Michael Keim, researcher and lead author of the study, in a statement. “These findings provide some of the clearest evidence yet that these galaxies formed together in a violent event that separated ordinary matter from dark matter.”

The new results could offer clues to the precise nature of what we think of as dark matter, pushing forward a more comprehensive understanding of the cosmos.

“The finding provides compelling evidence that dark matter behaves as a physical substance rather than the effect of an alternative theory of gravity, particularly at the dwarf-galaxy scale where those theories are most heavily debated,” said Pieter van Dokkum, a study co-author and Yale University astronomer, in the same statement.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe