New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Astronomers discover another galaxy seemingly devoid of dark matter

A galaxy appears to be missing the invisible substance thought to hold such objects together, further challenging long-held assumptions about how galaxies form

A close-up Hubble image of the galaxy DF9 is shown beneath a wider view of the surrounding NGC 1052 region.

A close-up Hubble image of the galaxy DF9 is shown beneath a wider view of the surrounding NGC 1052 region.

Credit: Keim et al./DECaLS/HST

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

NASA calls dark matter the glue that holds the universe together—but the evidence is mounting that, at least in some galaxies, dark matter isn’t so necessary. A new study led by astronomers at Yale University has identified a galaxy that appears to contain almost no dark matter at all. This is the third galaxy of its kind to be found—two other galaxies were previously discovered to be devoid of the elusive adhesive.

This new galaxy, named DF9, was found lurking in the same thin chain of galaxies as the first two, called DF2 and DF4, although it is some 100 times dimmer. Using an instrument called the Keck Cosmic Web Imager, researchers measured the motions of stars within DF9 and used those motions to estimate its mass. The result suggests that this galaxy contains little, if any, dark matter.

Dark matter is notoriously difficult to detect because it doesn’t interact with light. We can’t see it directly, but scientists infer its presence from its gravitational effects. The process is a bit like tracking an invisible person by their footprints in the snow. Dark matter leaves “footprints” in the motions of stars and galaxies, which often move as though they contain far more mass than we can see.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


That’s how dark matter was detected in the first place: astronomers noticed that galaxies seemed to be carrying around a great deal of invisible baggage. Many scientists believe it is critical to the fabric of the universe, although some physicists disagree that it exists at all.

For those who do accept dark matter, galaxies like DF9 present a different puzzle: Why is the dark matter missing? One leading explanation is that these galaxies were forged in violent collisions between two much larger galaxies. In this scenario, the smashups were so violent that ordinary matter separated from dark matter, resulting in these dark-matter-devoid objects.

DF9 may be the latest piece of evidence from that ancient cosmic pileup.

“Almost every galaxy in the universe is dominated by dark matter. But DF2, DF4, and now DF9 appear to be extraordinary exceptions,” said Michael Keim, a researcher and lead author of the study, in a statement. “These findings provide some of the clearest evidence yet that these galaxies formed together in a violent event that separated ordinary matter from dark matter.”

The new results could offer clues to the precise nature of what we think of as dark matter, pushing forward a more comprehensive understanding of the cosmos.

“The finding provides compelling evidence that dark matter behaves as a physical substance rather than the effect of an alternative theory of gravity, particularly at the dwarf-galaxy scale where those theories are most heavily debated,” said Pieter van Dokkum, a study co-author and Yale astronomer, in the same statement.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe