New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Astronomers May Have Unlocked the Reason for Betelgeuse’s Bizarre Dimming

Researchers found evidence that a companion star may be influencing Betelgeuse, explaining why the latter star’s brightness changes over time

An artist’s concept shows the red supergiant star Betelgeuse and an orbiting companion star.

NASA/ESA/Elizabeth Wheatley/STScI (artwork); Andrea Dupree/CfA (science)

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Astronomers may have finally solved one of the weirdest mysteries of our night sky: why Betelgeuse, a massive star in the constellation Orion, seems to fade and brighten as if it were operated by a heavenly dimmer switch.

Using the Hubble Space Telescope and ground-based observatories, scientists observed Betelgeuse for almost eight years and found that patterns in the star’s light suggested the wake of another, unseen star was passing through its atmosphere.

“It’s a bit like a boat moving through water. The companion star creates a ripple effect in Betelgeuse’s atmosphere that we can actually see in the data,” said Andrea Dupree, an astronomer at the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian and lead author of a preprint paper about the finding that will be published in the Astrophysical Journal, in a statement.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The other star appears to pass in front of Betelgeuse every six years or so. If the findings are confirmed by follow-up observations, they will help explain why Betelgeuse, a bright, nearby star that could fit 400 million suns inside it, periodically seems to be on the point of vanishing before our eyes. That’s what happened in 2020: at that time, Betelgeuse appeared so faint that it fed rumors that it was possibly about to explode into a supernova. (Astronomers, in general, did not think that such a cataclysm was imminent. But they were mightily confused.)

Scientists had predicted the existence of a companion star, dubbed Siwarha, before. But the evidence was lacking, Dupree said in the recent statement.

“With this new direct evidence, Betelgeuse gives us a front-row seat to watch how a giant star changes over time,” she said. “Finding the wake from its companion means we can now understand how stars like this evolve, shed material, and eventually explode as supernovae.”

The research was presented on Monday at the annual meeting of the American Astronomical Society.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe