New Issue: Science’s Impossible Questions. Read Now

Banish Procrastination by Thinking Differently about Deadlines

Trick your brain into meeting any due date

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

What makes some tasks harder than others to tackle? It turns out the time allotted for the work matters less than how our mind perceives the deadline. When a deadline feels like it is part of the present—say, falling within the current calendar month—we are more likely to begin the task.

In one experiment, researchers asked 100 undergraduates when they would start a data-entry task that they had five days to complete. For some, the hypothetical assignment started April 24 or 25, whereas others got the job April 26 or 27. Although the groups had the same amount of time, the students with a deadline in early May were less willing to begin the task right away, according to the study, which appeared in the Journal of Consumer Research.

An experiment involving 295 farmers in India had a similar outcome. At a finance lecture, the farmers learned they could earn a monetary benefit if they opened a bank account and saved a certain amount within six months. One group's six-month deadline landed in December, another group's in January. Farmers whose deadline came before year's end were more likely to open the account immediately and more likely to meet the six-month savings goal.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The findings illustrate how the brain divides time into discrete categories, with boundaries at the end of a month or the start of a new year, for instance. To motivate yourself to start a task you are putting off, try thinking about time boundaries differently. For a deadline next month, you might call it three weeks instead—or design a new calendar for yourself that does not break up the months. The researchers also suggest dividing a task into incremental steps with their own deadlines, which will feel more immediate.

Esther Landhuis is a journalist in the San Francisco Bay Area. She holds a Ph.D. in immunology and covers biomedicine in all dimensions, from bench discoveries to biotech in health care.

More by Esther Landhuis
SA Mind Vol 26 Issue 1This article was published with the title “Procrastination” in SA Mind Vol. 26 No. 1 (), p. 9
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0115-9a

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe