New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Chimpanzee Consumption of Boozy Fruit May Illuminate Roots of Humanity’s Love of Alcohol

Wild chimps ingest the equivalent of multiple alcoholic beverages a day

Close up of an adult chimpanzee, pan troglodytes, sitting in a tree, eating fruit in the rainforest of Kibale National Park, Uganda

A chimpanzee eats fruit in the rainforest of Kibale National Park in Uganda.

Rixipix/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

When chimpanzees eat ripe figs and other fruits in the wild, it’s a surprisingly boozy feast—the fruit they consume in a day contains the equivalent of a couple of adult beverages. That’s the upshot of a new study on the alcohol content of the preferred foods of one of our closest living relatives. The findings, published today in the journal Science Advances, may have implications for understanding human attraction to alcohol.

Chimpanzees are well known to be fruit lovers. In chimp communities in Uganda and Côte d’Ivoire, fruit makes up around 75 percent of their diet; scientists have documented the animals eating an estimated 10 pounds of fruit a day on average.

Some 25 years ago Robert Dudley of the University of California, Berkeley, who was studying monkeys at the time, proposed the “drunken monkey hypothesis,” which holds that we humans inherited our love of alcohol from our primate ancestors. The idea was that our primeval predecessors would have encountered ethanol—the form of alcohol found in wine, beer and spirits—in the fruit they ate, and evolved ways to exploit this resource. Being able to find and eat fruit containing ethanol might have helped them get more calories because fruits with higher concentrations of ethanol tend to be riper, with a higher sugar content.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


But back when Dudley formulated this hypothesis, scientists didn’t have enough data on the ethanol content of the fruits eaten by nonhuman primates to know whether early human ancestors could plausibly have encountered enough of the substance for it to be a significant factor in their evolution.

In the new study, U.C. Berkeley graduate student Aleksey Maro, Dudley and their colleagues set out to measure the ethanol content of 20 kinds of fruit favored by chimps at the sites of Ngogo in Uganda’s Kibale National Park and Taï in Côte d'Ivoire. They found that the fruit pulp contained around 0.3 percent ethanol by weight. That might not sound like much, but considering that the chimps eat 5 to 10 percent of their body weight in fruit each day, it adds up: the apes end up consuming some 14 grams of pure ethanol a day, the equivalent of a typical alcoholic beverage in the U.S. (or 1.4 drinks by international standards, as the researchers note).

When the researchers adjusted for the lower body mass of chimpanzees compared to humans, they determined that the chimps at Ngogo and Taï are ingesting the equivalent of more than two drinks a day on average. The total would be higher if the chimps chose riper fruits with higher sugar content.

“These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that ethanol is widespread within tropical fruits and that modern predisposition to alcohol consumption derives from ancestral exposure to this psychoactive substance among frugivorous primates,” Maro and his collaborators conclude in their paper.

Chimpanzees are not the only animals that consume alcohol. Other mammals, including elephants and tree shrews, and some birds, such as Cedar Waxwings and hummingbirds, eat fermented fruit and nectar, which contain ethanol. The effects of alcohol on the behavior of these animals are not well understood. But the authors of the new paper note that ripe fruit crops can attract large groups of chimps to a location, resulting in increased social interactions and social activities such as territorial patrols.

Kate Wong is an award-winning science writer and was formerly senior editor for features at Scientific American, where she focused on evolution, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, paleontology and animal behavior. She is fascinated by human origins, which she has covered for nearly 30 years. Recently she has become obsessed with birds. Her reporting has taken her to caves in France and Croatia that Neandertals once called home to the shores of Kenya’s Lake Turkana in search of the oldest stone tools in the world, as well as to Madagascar on an expedition to unearth ancient mammals and dinosaurs, the icy waters of Antarctica, where humpback whales feast on krill, and a “Big Day” race around the state of Connecticut to find as many bird species as possible in 24 hours. Wong is co-author, with Donald Johanson, of Lucy’s Legacy: The Quest for Human Origins. She holds a bachelor of science degree in biological anthropology and zoology from the University of Michigan. Follow her on Bluesky @katewong.bsky.social

More by Kate Wong

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe