China just launched fake human embryos to its space station for a new research mission

China’s artificial embryos are part of an experiment to learn more about how human pregnancies could develop under microgravity conditions

Light micrograph of embryo selection for IVF.

Science Photo Library–ZEPHYR/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A clutch of artificial human embryos on China’s Tiangong space station could help researchers better understand whether human pregnancies in space are possible and safe.

The Chinese Academy of Sciences says the experiment marks the first study on human artificial embryos in space. The artificial embryos are actually structures derived from stem cells, and they mimic how embryos form during the early days of pregnancy. These structures wouldn’t be able to develop into humans even if they were implanted into a uterus. Researchers originally conceived these artificial embryolike structures as a model to study the earliest moments of development because of widespread international rules aimed at restricting research on real human embryos that are older than two weeks after fertilization.

“The human artificial embryo is made of human stem cells as raw materials,” said project leader Yu Leqian in a statement. “This is not a real human embryo and does not have the ability to develop into an individual. However, it can serve as a model for studying early human development.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The artificial embryos were launched to the Tiangong space station earlier this month, and a control group is being examined in an Earth-based lab. The experiment was designed to last for five days, after which the samples onboard the space station were frozen. They will eventually be returned to Earth for analysis.

“We hope that by comparing the development of space and ground samples, we can identify the factors affecting early human embryonic growth in the space environment, and address the risks and challenges humans may face during long-term space habitation,” Yu said.

Fertility in space has long been an object of study, and the results so far have been mixed. In 1994 NASA astronauts successfully mated Japanese rice fish onboard a space shuttle. Yet several other experiments conducted on fruit flies in low-Earth orbit suggested the insects’ larvae had a higher death rate in that environment than on Earth. A past effort to raise mice embryos in space didn’t succeed either, and attempts at mating rats also failed to result in pregnancies. And in 2014 another mating experiment involving geckos almost ended in disaster after the Russian satellite they were on lost contact with ground control. While contact with the spacecraft was reestablished, the geckos perished before they could possibly make more geckos.

The science of human reproduction in microgravity is sparser, for perhaps obvious reasons. But as NASA and private space companies such as Elon Musk’s SpaceX have begun exploring long-term bases on the moon and Mars, the field has drawn more interest. Earlier this year Australian scientists put human sperm into a microgravity simulation chamber to see if they could navigate an artificial female reproductive system. The sperm, seemingly confused by the low gravity, tended to get lost on their way to their final destination.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

Thank you,

David M. Ewalt, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe