New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

China just launched fake human embryos to its space station for a new research mission

China’s artificial embryos are part of an experiment to learn more about how human pregnancies could develop under microgravity conditions

Light micrograph of embryo selection for IVF.

Science Photo Library–ZEPHYR/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

A clutch of artificial human embryos on China’s Tiangong space station could help researchers better understand whether human pregnancies in space are possible and safe.

The Chinese Academy of Sciences says the experiment marks the first study on human artificial embryos in space. The artificial embryos are actually structures derived from stem cells, and they mimic how embryos form during the early days of pregnancy. These structures wouldn’t be able to develop into humans even if they were implanted into a uterus. Researchers originally conceived these artificial embryolike structures as a model to study the earliest moments of development because of widespread international rules aimed at restricting research on real human embryos that are older than two weeks after fertilization.

“The human artificial embryo is made of human stem cells as raw materials,” said project leader Yu Leqian in a statement. “This is not a real human embryo and does not have the ability to develop into an individual. However, it can serve as a model for studying early human development.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The artificial embryos were launched to the Tiangong space station earlier this month, and a control group is being examined in an Earth-based lab. The experiment was designed to last for five days, after which the samples onboard the space station were frozen. They will eventually be returned to Earth for analysis.

“We hope that by comparing the development of space and ground samples, we can identify the factors affecting early human embryonic growth in the space environment, and address the risks and challenges humans may face during long-term space habitation,” Yu said.

Fertility in space has long been an object of study, and the results so far have been mixed. In 1994 NASA astronauts successfully mated Japanese rice fish onboard a space shuttle. Yet several other experiments conducted on fruit flies in low-Earth orbit suggested the insects’ larvae had a higher death rate in that environment than on Earth. A past effort to raise mice embryos in space didn’t succeed either, and attempts at mating rats also failed to result in pregnancies. And in 2014 another mating experiment involving geckos almost ended in disaster after the Russian satellite they were on lost contact with ground control. While contact with the spacecraft was reestablished, the geckos perished before they could possibly make more geckos.

The science of human reproduction in microgravity is sparser, for perhaps obvious reasons. But as NASA and private space companies such as Elon Musk’s SpaceX have begun exploring long-term bases on the moon and Mars, the field has drawn more interest. Earlier this year Australian scientists put human sperm into a microgravity simulation chamber to see if they could navigate an artificial female reproductive system. The sperm, seemingly confused by the low gravity, tended to get lost on their way to their final destination.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe