New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Doting male mouse dads share a genetic signature, new study finds

New research on African striped mice found that the caregiving instinct may be rooted in a specific gene

Male African striped mouse with pups

Paternal care is rare in mammals, but male African striped mice can be doting fathers.

C. Todd Reichart/Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

In the animal kingdom, doting dads are scarce: Research shows as few as 3 to 5 percent of mammalian fathers take an active role in parenting their offspring. But the reason why some seem more geared toward parenting than others, at least in part, may come down to their neurobiology.

According to a new study on African striped mice, a single gene may play an outsize role in parental caregiving in male mice. By studying the brains of males of the species, researchers found that more aggressive males tended to have higher expression of a gene called Agouti than those that were more caring toward young mice. Activating the gene in the caring mice also made them more aggressive toward pups, the researchers found.

Interestingly, mice that lived in groups were more likely to have higher Agouti expression than male mice that lived alone, suggesting that aspects of a mouse’s environment—such as resource scarcity or population level—may be playing a role in its caregiving instincts, explains Forrest Rogers, a postdoctoral researcher at Princeton University and lead author of the study.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


An important takeaway from the study is that the male mice “have what they need to be good dads,” says Catherine Peña, an assistant professor of neuroscience at Princeton University and senior author of the study.

“We didn’t find that they needed new circuitry,” she says. “We didn’t find that they had some unique evolution of cells in the brain that they needed to be dads.”

Rather their findings suggest that “there may be optimal conditions to help promote one’s own best parenting,” she says.

The research was published on Wednesday in the journal Nature.

African striped mice, like humans, are among the few mammals for which the males typically act as caregivers to young—at least to some extent. In the wild, male mice can be observed caring for pups by grooming them or providing them with food. But some seem to lack this instinct altogether and ignore or even kill their pups.

The study is an “important step forward for the field of parental behavior and its brain origins,” says Christian Broberger, a professor of neurochemistry at Stockholm University in Sweden. The neurobiology of maternal parenting is relatively well studied, Broberger says, but “far less” is known about paternal parenting. The finding that Agouti—a gene known for roles in pigmentation and metabolism—may play a part in paternal instinct was a “surprise,” he says.

The results offer clues to the potential neurobiology underlying what makes male mammals tend to their children, although the study was obviously limited to mice. The findings don’t extrapolate to human fathers or indicate that there may be a “magic pill for parenting,” Peña says.

But future research could illuminate whether other species also share similar neurobiology.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe