New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Elon Musk’s SpaceX reportedly mulling a merger with xAI

SpaceX and xAI could join forces ahead of Elon Musk’s plan to take the former public later this year, according to Reuters

Elon Musk

Apu Gomes/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Elon Musk’s aerospace company SpaceX and his artificial intelligence start-up xAI are reportedly mulling a merger, a move that would bring SpaceX’s rockets and its satellite Internet subsidiary Starlink under a single umbrella with xAI—which oversees the social media platform X and the chatbot Grok.

The two wings of Musk’s sprawling tech empire could merge ahead of a plan to take SpaceX public later this year, according to Reuters, which cited an anonymous source and recent company filings. SpaceX’s initial public offering could see the company valued at $1.5 trillion, according to the Financial Times. A merger with xAI could boost Musk’s plan to use SpaceX’s still-in-development Starship rocket to launch orbital AI data centers, experts have speculated.

Musk and other AI leaders are increasingly bullish on space as an answer to all the problems with data centers: Though costly to build and expensive to power, increasingly sprawling data centers are central to many AI company’s growth strategies. If the demand for AI continues to grow, earthbound data centers—and power supplies—may not be able to keep up. Data centers in orbit, however, would have practically unlimited access to solar energy—although such hardware would also come with its limits.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


SpaceX and xAI did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe