New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Fun Details about the Human Side of Science

The Thwaites Ice Shelf is cracking up, humans learned to walk many times, and covert consciousness can be detected in unresponsive patients

Scientific American, November 2022

Scientific American, November 2022

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

The Thwaites Ice Shelf is one of the most important geological features on the planet, and it’s in trouble. The 800-square-kilometer slab of ice floats in front of Antarctica’s enormous Thwaites Glacier and braces it in place. In the past few years scientists have found new ways the ice shelf is melting, cracking and wobbling. Science journalist Douglas Fox accompanied researchers as they pulled sleds full of radar equipment across the ice to study its interior, finding surprises with every new observation. The consequences of a Thwaites Ice Shelf collapse would be catastrophic, flooding coastal towns around the world, and it could start to crumble in a decade.

The implications of Thwaites research are grim, but the article about it is actually a lot of fun. The details make the story: Antarctic ice that crunches like cornflakes, the snowy fuff when scientists detonated explosives, and the possibility that on a future mission, scientists will wake up to find themselves unexpectedly floating on an iceberg.

The editors at Scientific American encourage our authors to share the amusing, weird, awe-inspiring, scary, human side of science in their stories. Paleoanthropologist Jeremy DeSilva really came through for us, with a memorable anecdote about researchers playing dodgeball with elephant dung before they discovered an important bed of fossilized footprints. I laughed out loud when I read his methodology for a research project that involved applesauce (I won’t spoil it). The fascinating conclusion to all this Very Serious Research is that humans learned to walk many times in our evolutionary history, with very different gaits and postures. When multiple hominin species lived in the same place, they might have been able to tell one another apart from a distance based on how they walked.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


New techniques for assessing brain activity are revealing that some patients who appear to be in a coma or unresponsive can understand some of what’s happening around them. Detecting “covert consciousness” can help guide treatments and predict clinical outcomes. Neurologists Jan Claassen and Brian L. Edlow are working to improve methods of testing for covert consciousness, and they explore what it means for our understanding of consciousness itself.

Subatomic particles appear to be breaking a rule called “lepton flavor universality.” Physicists are getting really excited about their strange behavior, and I hope you will, too, after you read theoretical physicist Andreas Crivellin’s story. The Standard Model has been extremely successful at helping us understand the subatomic world, but it doesn’t explain everything. Strangely behaving particles have the potential to reveal what’s wrong or what’s missing from our understanding of everything from neutrinos to dark matter.

Certain newly invented materials behave strangely as well. Some of these “metamaterials” bend light in unusual ways, cloaking an object to make it invisible. They’re engineered at the nanoscale, with a range of features that bend light and sound to their whim. Physicist and engineer Andrea Alù describes how metamaterials can support superconductivity and break symmetries.

Citizens’ assemblies are groups of people who work together to understand a problem, find solutions and build consensus, especially for divisive issues. They’ve been around since ancient Greece, but they’re becoming more popular lately. These assemblies are much more inclusive and representative than representative democracy, but the process of choosing participants can still be tricky. Computer scientist Ariel Procaccia shares his work on creating and refining an algorithm for democracy.

Laura Helmuth was formerly editor in chief of Scientific American. She previously worked as an editor for the Washington Post, National Geographic, Slate, Smithsonian and Science. She is a former president of the National Association of Science Writers. She is currently a member of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's standing committee on advancing science communication and an advisory board member for SciLine and The Transmitter. She has a Ph.D. in cognitive neuroscience from the University of California, Berkeley. She recently won a Friend of Darwin Award from the National Center for Science Education. Follow her on Bluesky @laurahelmuth.bsky.social

More by Laura Helmuth
Scientific American Magazine Vol 327 Issue 5This article was published with the title “Our Human Side” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 327 No. 5 (), p. 4
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1122-4

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe