New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Glaciers are secretly teeming with life

What does it take for an insect or worm to live full-time on a glacier?

Two dark animals on a background of backlit ice.

Two glacier stoneflies (Andiperla willinki), insects that live in Chile.

R. Isaí Madriz

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Glaciers are awe-inspiring, slow-moving rivers of ice powerful enough to reshape Earth—but for certain wee creatures, they’re also home.

New research has identified more than 150 different species that live on glaciers, with nearly half of these animals having only ever been reported at glacial sites. And these are true animals, not single-celled microbes. Even more intriguingly, these critters seem to show patterns in where they’re found, with different types of species turning up in specific types of glacier habitats, according to research published today in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA.

“People usually picture glaciers as all the same, a white field,” says co-author Andrea Simoncini, a Ph.D. student in environmental sciences at the University of Milan in Italy. But that isn’t true, he says. Some patches of ice are covered with fresh snow; others are covered with dirt that blew onto the surface or streams and pools that were formed by meltwater. Then there are “glacier mice,” tumbleweedlike balls of moss that scientists are only beginning to inspect for hidden residents, Simoncini says. Cryoconite holes, small pools of meltwater eaten into the glacier’s surface by debris heated by the sun, also provide habitats.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


As Simoncini and his colleagues pored through more than 100 existing studies reporting animals that were found living in these various habitats, they were surprised to notice trends in what was found where. The inhabitants of cryoconite holes, for example, were dominated by puffy tardigrades, or “water bears,” and rotifers, tiny critters with a ring of hairlike extensions at their front. In contrast, debris on top of glaciers were home mostly to nematodes, or roundworms, and little, insectlike springtails.

Although individual research papers convey the wonders of, for example, discovering a species of ice worm that might teach scientists to make other species better able to tolerate extreme cold, the new study offers a global look at the marvels of glacier animals. It also shows how much we’re likely missing out on because of how difficult these habitats are to explore. What research there has been is unevenly distributed, Simoncini says, with exploration focused on western North America, Greenland, parts of Europe and the Himalayas.

And because glaciers are rapidly melting as Earth’s temperatures rise as a result of the burning of fossil fuels, these research gaps are urgent, Simoncini says. “We are probably losing each year, each month, species that we don’t even know exist,” he says.

Meghan Bartels is a science journalist based in New York City. She was previously a senior reporter at Scientific American. Before that she spent more than four years as a writer and editor at Space.com, as well as nearly a year as a science reporter at Newsweek, where she focused on space and Earth science. Her writing has also appeared in Audubon, Nautilus, Astronomy and Smithsonian, among other publications. She attended Georgetown University and earned a master’s degree in journalism at New York University’s Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program.

More by Meghan Bartels

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe