New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Golden Goose Awards Highlight Weird-Sounding Science with Big Benefits

Why it's worth spending $250,000 to research worm sex

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Sometimes the greatest scientific discoveries come from research that seems simplistic, esoteric or flat-out bizarre. The weirder the better for the organizers of the Golden Goose Awards. Sponsored by a number of leading scientific societies, the awards were launched last year to celebrate the importance of federally funded basic research projects that may sound quirky but sometimes deliver tremendous payoffs.

“When you call somebody and tell them you'd like to present them with a Golden Goose Award, their first question is often, Is this a joke? Who is this, really?” says Barry Toiv, one of the organizers and vice president of public affairs for the Association of American Universities. “Once you explain it, they get it, and our recipients have all seemed to deeply appreciate the recognition.”

This year's awardees included Thomas Brock, who in the 1960s used a National Science Foundation grant to discover a heat-loving bacterium called Thermus aquaticus in a hydrothermal pool at Yellowstone National Park. An enzyme extracted from that microbe is now a key part of the polymerase chain reaction, which amplifies small samples of DNA for study—and which powers a multibillion-dollar industry of genetic analysis. “I was doing basic research on organisms at high temperatures and focusing on evolution and ecology,” Brock says. “I wasn't even thinking about industrial uses.”


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Another honoree, John Eng, found in 1992 that the poisonous saliva of the Gila monster lizard could stimulate insulin production, which led to the development of the diabetes drug exenatide. “A lot of research doesn't end in major discoveries,” says Eng, who worked for the Department of Veterans Affairs at the time. “But it might, and I don't think anyone can predict which will.”

The Golden Goose Awards were inspired by the Golden Fleece award, which the late Wisconsin senator William Proxmire dished out in the 1970s and 1980s to bring attention to what he viewed as wasteful government spending. Instead Proxmire often targeted valuable research.

Proxmire once mocked the U.S. Department of Agriculture for investing $250,000 to explore the sex life of the screwworm. But the federal investment paid off handsomely. The study of the livestock parasite showed that female screwworms mate only once, whereas males mate many times. By creating a host of sterile male worms and releasing them in the wild, usda scientists eradicated the pest, saving the livestock industry billions of dollars. Ultimately even Proxmire came around to acknowledging the importance of the research.

Nowadays, as federal budgets constrict, funding for basic research is in the crosshairs once again. With the Golden Goose Awards, Toiv and his colleagues aim to remind policy makers that even worm voyeurism can yield innovations that the country needs.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe