New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

50, 100 & 150 Years Ago: Defending Scopes, Wrong on Earthquakes, and Comet Cleaners

Innovation and discovery as chronicled in past issues of Scientific American

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

JANUARY 1959
A VOICE FROM THE SCOPES TRIAL— “‘This is Clarence Darrow,’ said the voice at the other end of the wire, ‘I suppose you have been reading the papers, so you know Bryan and his outfit are prosecuting that young fellow Scopes. Well, Malone, Colby and I have put ourselves in a mess by offering to defend. We don’t know much about evolution. We don’t know whom to call as witnesses. But we do know we are fighting your battle for academic freedom. We need the help of you fellows at the University, so I am asking three of you to come to my office to help lay plans.’

That afternoon in Darrow’s office three of us from the University of Chicago—Horatio Hackett Newman, professor of biology; Shailer Mathews, dean of the Divinity School; and I—met to outline the strategy for what turned out to be one of the most publicized trials of the century. —Fay-Cooper Cole”

[NOTE: In 1925 Cole was an anthropologist at Chicago who wrote the 1959 article "A Witness to the Scopes Trial"]


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


THE ATOMIC NUCLEUS— “In fact the trouble in the recent past has been a surfeit of different models [of the nucleus], each of them successful in explaining the behavior of nuclei in some situations, and each in apparent contradiction with other successful models or with our ideas about nuclear forces. In the past few years great progress has been made in bringing some order into this confusion and in understanding the justification for each of the models in the domain to which it is properly applied. A picture thus emerges in which the various, apparently contradictory, models of the nucleus are seen as consistent parts of a whole, each appropriate for answering certain questions about the behavior of nuclei. —R. E. Peierls”

JANUARY 1909
WHY EARTHQUAKES?— “In all probability, an earthquake is one of the necessary consequences of the gradual cooling of the earth. As terrestrial heat is gradually declining through its radiation out into space, it follows that the bulk of the earth must be gradually shrinking. Accordingly the crust of the earth has from time to time to accommodate itself to the fact that the whole globe is slowly but surely getting smaller. Even a slight displacement of one extensive surface over another would be accompanied by violence greatly exceeding that which we might expect from so small a displacement, resulting in the wholesale destruction of houses, villages, and even large cities, and infrequently great sacrifice of human life.”

WOOD FOR THE IRON HORSE— “So serious is becoming the question of supplying ties for our railroads, that the Santa Fe system recently sent its manager of the timber and tie department on a tour to the Orient and Europe, to make a study of conditions. It was learned, among other things, that three hundred years ago the Japanese government began to conserve its forests; and that, as a result of its foresight, Japan is now selling ties to railroads in this country and Mexico. That we should be paying a twenty per cent import duty on ties is one among many constantly accumulating evidences of the thoughtless extravagance with which our magnificent timber supply has been ruthlessly swept away.”

JANUARY 1859
WHAT USE ARE COMETS?— “The question of the utility of comets has always held a conspicuous place. S. W. Fullom, well known as the author of some pleasant books, suggests a use for comets in his ‘Marvels of Science’: Descartes, Euler, and many others believed that there is a subtle media pervading all space, which they called ‘ether,’ and which forms the ocean in which the planets and fixed stars swim. In this media the comets act as scavengers, preventing any accumulations of ether, and keeping it in such a proper and equable state of tenuity that the forces of nature, as gravity, electricity, and light, always act with regularity and precision.”

Note: This article was originally printed with the title, "Universal Behavior | Airplane for Enthusiasts | Candle in the Dark".

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe