New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

Learning Another Language May Slow Brain Aging, Huge New Study Finds

A large international study suggests that being multilingual can slow down cognitive aging

Three paper cut-outs in the shape of speech bubbles read bonjour, hello and hola

Prostock-Studio/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Speaking multiple languages could slow down brain ageing and help to prevent cognitive decline, a study of more than 80,000 people has found.

The work, published in Nature Aging on 10 November, suggests that people who are multilingual are half as likely to show signs of accelerated biological ageing as are those who speak just one language.

“We wanted to address one of the most persistent gaps in ageing research, which is if multilingualism can actually delay ageing,” says study co-author Agustín Ibáñez, a neuroscientist at the Adolfo Ibáñez University in Santiago, Chile. Previous research in this area has suggested that speaking multiple languages can improve cognitive functions such memory and attention, which boosts brain health as we get older. But many of these studies rely on small sample sizes and use unreliable methods of measuring ageing, which leads to results that are inconsistent and not generalizable.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“The effects of multilingualism on ageing have always been controversial, but I don’t think there has been a study of this scale before, which seems to demonstrate them quite decisively,” says Christos Pliatsikas, a cognitive neuroscientist at the University of Reading, UK. The paper’s results could “bring a step change to the field”, he adds.

They might also “encourage people to go out and try to learn a second language, or keep that second language active”, says Susan Teubner-Rhodes, a cognitive psychologist at Auburn University in Alabama.

Long live linguists

The researchers used a computational approach to explore the link between multilingualism and healthy ageing in 86,000 healthy participants aged between 51 and 90 years across 27 European counties.

For each participant, they determined the biobehavioural age gap, the difference between their chronological age — the number of years they have been alive — and their ‘predicted’ age, which considers various physiological, lifestyle and socioeconomic factors, ranging from cardiometabolic health to education level. A high biobehavioural age gap can be a sign that someone is ageing particularly fast — or slowly.

The researchers compared participants’ biobehavioural age gaps with the number of languages they spoke. This part of the data was based on self-reporting and therefore didn’t account for the level of language proficiency.

The researchers found that people who spoke only one language were twice as likely to have a high biobehavioural age gap than were those who spoke two or more languages. This effect increased with number of extra languages spoken. “Just one additional language reduces the risk of accelerated ageing. But when you speak two or three this effect was larger,” says Ibáñez.

Such a large study “really strengthens the interpretation that multilingualism, rather than other factors, protects us during ageing”, says Teubner-Rhodes. “It was using a really large, geographically diverse sample and that allowed them to control for a number of confounders that are typically present in multilingualism research, like immigrant status and wealth.” Future research should include more diverse populations outside Europe, she adds.

The researchers hope that their findings will influence policymakers to encourage language learning in education.

This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on November 10, 2025.

First published in 1869, Nature is the world's leading multidisciplinary science journal. Nature publishes the finest peer-reviewed research that drives ground-breaking discovery, and is read by thought-leaders and decision-makers around the world.

More by Nature magazine

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe