New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

How did mosquitoes get their taste for our blood? Ancient humans may hold the clues

A new genetic analysis suggests some mosquitoes’ taste for human blood may date back 1.8 million years

Mosquito on skin drinks blood

iiievgeniy/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Mosquitoes are the deadliest animal on the planet, killing hundreds of thousands of people every year by transmitting malaria, dengue fever and a host of other deadly diseases. Understanding how the insects first got the taste for human blood has long intrigued scientists and could help us better fight the spread of mosquito-borne disease. Now a new study suggests that some mosquitoes’ thirst for human blood may be truly primeval, stretching back as far as 1.8 million years ago—a time when our ancient human ancestor Homo erectus may have been flourishing.

In the study, published on Thursday in Scientific Reports, an international team of researchers analyzed the DNA of 40 mosquitoes from 11 species of the Anopheles leucosphyrus group that are found in Southeast Asia. What makes this group of mosquito species so special is that some of the species have a strong preference for human blood, while others mostly feast on other primates, such as monkeys, gibbons and orangutans, says Upasana Shyamsunder Singh, a postdoctoral scholar at Vanderbilt University and lead author of the study.

The team calculated that the mosquitoes likely developed their “anthropophily”—their taste for human blood—at a point some 2.9 million to 1.6 million years ago. This overlaps with the same period in which some scientists believe H. erectus, an early hominin, arrived in the region.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“The switch to human feeding was much older than we expected and so could not have been in response to the arrival of anatomically modern humans,” says Catherine Walton, a study co-author and a senior lecturer in Earth and environmental sciences at the University of Manchester in England.

For mosquitoes to have made a switch from other primates to hominins, ancient humans such as H. erectus “must not only have been present in this place and at this time but abundant,” she says.

The results aren’t just relevant for researchers who study human evolution; they’re also an important signal for epidemiologists who are looking to understand mosquito-borne diseases. These insects are still evolving, and humans are increasingly encroaching on wild areas—more mosquitoes could continue to adapt to prefer feasting on us over other animals.

“We are effectively creating novel selective pressures and we should expect mosquitoes to respond to these,” Walton says.

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe